Michii vs NanoCorp

Both run a company without you in the loop.
Michii leaves you a loop to step into.

NanoCorp is the most rigorous version of the fully autonomous idea — built by ML engineers, YC-backed, with aggregate company revenue published in the open. Michii wants the same outcome and splits on three things: whether the product itself gets built, whether work ships without your sign-off, and who keeps the revenue.

Free during beta · Live by tonight · You stay in control

Pick NanoCorp if

  • You want full autonomy and agree that approval steps slow the loop down.
  • You want to read published revenue data before trusting a platform.
  • A hard per-task budget cap and metered credits fit how you want to spend.

Pick Michii if

  • You need the product itself built and shipped, not only operated.
  • You want to see and approve what goes out under your name.
  • You want your own Stripe and 100% of the revenue, with no fee to withdraw it.

NanoCorp vs Michii, capability by capability

Same category, opposite instincts about the human. NanoCorp removes the approval step on purpose; Michii keeps it on purpose. Neither of those is a bug.

NanoCorp versus Michii — capability by capability
CapabilityNanoCorpMichiiMichii
Shared modelNanoCorpAI agents run a company on a scheduleMichiiAI agents build and run your business daily
Built forNanoCorpOwners who set a mission and step backMichiiLow-technical founders, kept in charge
Who builds the productNanoCorpAgents run the work: content, outreach, ops, adsMichiiAn Engineer agent ships the app itself, then keeps fixing it
Approval gatesNanoCorpNone by design — agents act without askingMichiiWork lands as artifacts you approve, save, or discard
Watching the workNanoCorpOwner reports back from each scheduled runMichiiWatch each agent live in Commander chat
Published resultsNanoCorpAggregate company revenue published openlyMichiiNot published — your numbers stay yours
Where it runsNanoCorpIsolated sandboxes with per-task budget capsMichiiAn isolated sandbox per workspace
PaymentsNanoCorpRevenue withdrawn through the platformMichiiYour own Stripe; the money is yours
Pricing modelNanoCorp$30/mo Founder tier, metered creditsMichiiFree during beta; no usage passthrough
Your upsideNanoCorpA 20% fee when you withdraw revenueMichiiYou keep 100% of what you earn

NanoCorp details reflect its public site and pricing as of mid-2026, including the stated 20% revenue-withdrawal fee and the $30/mo Founder tier; confirm current terms on nanocorp.so.

Three honest differences

1

Whether the product gets built

NanoCorp's published description of agent work centres on running a company — content, outreach, ops, and ads on a schedule. Michii starts a step earlier: the Engineer agent ships the actual app or site, keeps fixing what breaks, and only then grows it. If you're starting from an idea rather than from a business that already exists, that gap is the whole decision.

2

Whether the approval step is a feature

NanoCorp's argument is explicit and coherent — it says approval gates kill the gradient, because every human checkpoint slows the loop it optimizes against. Michii takes the opposite bet: generated work lands as artifacts you approve, save, or discard, because it's your name on the outreach and your customers reading it. That's a difference in appetite, not in capability.

3

Who keeps the revenue

NanoCorp charges a 20% fee on revenue withdrawal on top of its metered credits — clean incentive alignment, since the platform only wins when you do. Michii is free during beta, payments run through your own Stripe, and nothing is taken on the way out. Two defensible models; just know which one you're signing up for.

Honest answers to the questions people ask

Is Michii a NanoCorp alternative?

Yes — both are autonomous AI companies: agent teams that do the work on a schedule and report back. The differences are what gets built (Michii ships the product itself), who signs off (Michii keeps you as the approver), and who keeps the revenue (Michii takes no cut).

What's the biggest difference between Michii and NanoCorp?

The approval step. NanoCorp deliberately has no per-action approval gate, on the reasoning that checkpoints slow the learning loop. Michii deliberately keeps one: generated work arrives as artifacts you approve, save, or discard before anything goes out under your name.

Does Michii take a cut of my revenue like NanoCorp?

No. Michii is free during beta and takes no revenue share. Payments run through your own Stripe and the money is yours. NanoCorp's published model is a $30/mo Founder tier with metered credits plus a 20% fee when you withdraw revenue.

Is NanoCorp more autonomous than Michii?

In the strict sense, yes — it runs without asking. Michii runs a full daily loop on its own too, but it stops at "here's what needs you" instead of publishing and sending on your behalf. That boundary is a design choice for people who want to stay accountable for what ships.

Does NanoCorp build the app for me?

Its public materials describe agents doing content, outreach, ops, and ads on a schedule rather than building a product from scratch — check nanocorp.so for what its agents cover today. With Michii, building the product is the starting point: you describe the idea and a live app exists the same night.

Which should I choose?

If you want the purest hands-off autonomy, like that NanoCorp publishes real revenue data, and don't mind the withdrawal fee, it's a serious and well-engineered product. If you need the product built for you and want to stay the person who approves what goes out and keeps the upside, that's the seat Michii was designed for.

Other NanoCorp alternatives worth knowing

Michii isn't the only option, and it isn't the right one for everybody. Here's what else is in this space and what each is genuinely best at — every one has its own honest comparison.

See all comparisons

Same autonomy. Different seat.
Keep the sign-off. Keep the revenue.

No credit card · Free during beta · You stay the owner